At present, the Ministry of Finance and more than 10 regions including Jiangsu, Fujian and Zhejiang have successively introduced standards for the provision of office furniture and furniture. From the overall perspective of standard setting, these standards mainly stipulate the number of physical equipment, price ceiling and service life standard. There are few requirements for environmental protection requirements, product quality, product materials, etc., and no different products. Targeted settings for years of use and actual needs of different work environments. Therefore, the author believes that the standard content is still slightly more general.
The standardization of government procurement is the trend of the times. How to do a good job in the procurement of furniture and budget standards, and the connection between government procurement and asset management has become an important issue in the standardization of government procurement.
Here, we might as well listen to the voices of some companies. In the contact with the company, the author understands that the company's views on these standards are also different. Some enterprises believe that the formulation of standards is reasonable, can meet the needs of government procurement, and also meet the requirements of corporate services for government procurement and sustainable development. However, some companies have put forward their own views on this. The relevant person in charge of a furniture company believes that some manufacturers of furniture standardization may not have actually engaged in furniture procurement. Therefore, some actual conditions for furniture procurement work often cannot be considered in the formulation of standards. For example, the purchase of filing cabinets is often related to the height of the office. Different indoor heights may require different sizes of products, and the material consumption caused by the change in size will affect the cost of the product, which may break the price ceiling. However, suppliers are not likely to make money-losing services, so some suppliers may find ways to "satisfy" the requirements of the standard, and some may reduce the consumption of the main material, or some may make a fuss about the quantity. The final effect is the actual effect of the purchase. Therefore, the development of standards still requires some flexibility, combined with the actual needs of the work environment, and not too general.
In addition, the price ceiling in the government procurement standard has become the key to standard setting. In the end, it is really difficult to set the price ceiling. In this regard, the author believes that while fully integrating the market conditions and configuration needs, it is also advisable to set aside a relatively reasonable profit margin from the perspective of enterprise cost, so as to ensure the rationality of the price regulations and avoid depressing suppliers. Profit margins.
As we all know, while government procurement meets the needs of the government, it must promote the development of industries and enterprises. Only by leaving the company with appropriate profit margins, can it be nourished and healthyly grown by government procurement “nutrientsâ€, and then it can continuously improve the enterprise. The level and capacity of government procurement services and the continued development of the entire industry.
Ningbo XISXI E-commerce Co., Ltd , https://www.petspetsdoggze.com